With the recent passing
of bills from the government; a bill was signed with providing surface mining
runoff to inhabit our beautiful freshwater streams. The bill that was signed
was H.J. Res. 38; it was signed on February 16, 2017. This bill would no longer
help to protect waterways from coal mining waste in the United States of America.
With this recent signing, there will be no protection on the headwaters of
steams when there is removal of mountain top coal in the United States of
America. Headwaters are one of the most important part of the waterways. It
fuels the streams and rivers all over the United States. Mountain top coal
removal will only bring more debris into our local freshwater streams hurting
the aquatic life we have today.
Figure 1 Stream in central Pennsylvania
When it comes to
mountains, a natural elevation of Earth’s surface that rises to a summit;
everything is going to run off to a shallower elevation. These shallower
elevations are called valleys. In most cases they’re waterways that lay at the
bottom of these valleys, known as streams and rivers. Figure 1 shows a small
native stream in central Pennsylvania. This stream is one of 3.5 million miles
of streams and rivers combined in the United States of America. In
Pennsylvania, this small native stream is one of 85,000 miles of combined
streams and rivers. These statics show that almost every valley contains a
stream or river at the bottom of a mountain. Whatever happens on top of the
mountain will affect what’s on the bottom of the mountain in this case, it
would be the streams and rivers.
With mountain top coal
removal, this small stream in central Pennsylvania that contains the
Pennsylvania state fish (Brook trout) will become polluted with surface run off
and debris. Mountain top coal removal is responsible for burying more than 2,000
miles of Appalachian headwaters streams. Acid mine drainage is a major fact in
polluting streams and rivers in Pennsylvania and the rest of the states. Acid
mine drainage is the mixture of water and unearthed rocks such as coal. This
mixture contains high levels of heavy metals that are leaked out of abandoned
mines. Since mountain top coal removal will happen on top, this mixture will
run down the side of the mountain and end up in the streams and rivers.
Polluting everything in that stream or river. Bringing the coal industry back
will bring all the coal jobs back including strip mining. Strip mining also has
a major impact on the streams and rivers. Strip mining clears everything on top
of a mountain. Strip mining also uses a blasting technique to reach the coal.
This technique throw debris into the streams and rivers in the valley. Clearing
everything out, leaves a layer of topsoil. When it rains, this topsoil disturbs
the streams and river. Blocking the flow of the water and creating floods. It also
disturbs the aquatic and plant life. These are some of the examples that can
pollute the streams and rivers in the United States. Every one of these
examples, can alter the quality of water in a stream and river. In most cases,
it will decrease the quality of water.
Figure 2 Polluted stream from mountain top
coal removal
Not only does mountain
top coal removal hurt the streams and rivers, it also has a big impact on the
aquatic life in the streams and rivers. The life cycle of aquatic life can be
altered by the quality of the water causing populations to decrease becoming
threatened or endangered. A good indicator of water quality is the fish. For
example native brook trout prefer water quality around a pH of 6.5 to 8.0. The
closer to a pH of 7 the better off native brook trout are. However, the
pollutants from mining causes the streams and rivers to decrease in quality
causing fish to die off. A study was done in 2014, showing that fish
populations in a stream down from a site of mountain top coal removal were
reduce by two-thirds between 1999 and 2011. This study took place in the Appalachia
region mainly in West Virginia, Virginia, Kentucky, and Tennessee.
Macroinvertebrates are also impacted by this type of mining. Doug Wood a
biologist for West Virginia’s Department of Environmental Protection, found
evidence that an entire order of mayfly vanished from a stream that was down
from a mountain top mining site. Finally, what about salamanders living by the
streams and river. Filling in the valleys with mining debris will only result
in less salamander life. I do not know about you, but I grew up looking for
salamanders by streams. It was one thing I enjoyed doing when being outside in
nature.
Figure 3 Brook Trout
Other people may have the
view point of job creation; although by passing and signing bills in congress,
we will allow the coal mining to start up again. Bringing back the coal mining
business will increase jobs for the United States of America. There is no doubt
that it would create jobs in the future. It may even bring the coal towns that
once ruled the rural areas in West Virginia and Virginia. This would help us
with the unemployment rate. Some people may look at coal mining as the answer
of all their problems. So, what if a coal mining site hurts one little stream,
at least I will be able to work and make a pay check for my family. Everyone
has a different view on this issue.
Mountain top coal removal
contains many impact on the United States. Impacts such as a decrease in water
quality, creating jobs, polluting streams and rivers, and killing life forms.
Mountain top coal removal will only bring more debris into our local freshwater
streams hurting the aquatic life we have today. Can you imagine trout will be
spawning among coal mining waste such as toxic heavy metals? I ask every reader
out there, what is your view point on mountain top coal removal, is it good or
bad?
Literature Cited:
Appalachian Voices. 2013.
Ecological impacts of mountaintop removal. <
http://appvoices.org/end-mountaintop-removal/ecology/>.
Accessed 24 Feb 2017.
Forbes. 2017. Hey
anglers, get ready to enjoy some toxic heavy metals with your trout fishing.
<
https://www.forbes.com/sites/monteburke/2017/02/17/hey-anglers-get-ready-to-enjoy-
some-toxic-heavy-metals-with-your-trout-fishing/#22ecc45bc8aa>. Accessed 18
Feb
2017.
Greenpeace International.
2016. About coal mining impacts. <
http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/campaigns/climate-change/coal/Coal-mining-
impacts/>. Accessed 20 Feb 2017
Pennsylvania Fish and
Boat Commission [PFBC]. 2017. Fishing. <
http://www.fishandboat.com/Fish/Fishing/Pages/default.aspx>.
Accessed 20 Feb 2017.
United States
Environmental Protection Agency [EPA]. 2013. Rivers and streams. <
https://archive.epa.gov/water/archive/web/html/index-17.html>. Accessed 20 Feb 2017.
Imagines Cited:
Figure 1: Chelby Sherwood
Figure 2: Appalachian
Voices: http://appvoices.org/end-mountaintop-removal/ecology/
Figure 3: Chelby Sherwood
Hi Chelby, great blog post. I do not agree with mountain top coal removal. I believe that coal mining is important to many people and for the job aspect and energy. In some way its going to be around for a while. I think that they should find a alternative way for this removal, even if it may cost extra money it is not okay to put our trout species in danger like that.
ReplyDeleteyou bring up a lot of good points. I live in Clarion County and this area has had a tremendous amount of mining done and the quality of the streams here is bad. I can think of 4 streams or creeks and 1 river within 2 miles of my home that has been polluted to the point that is zero aquatic life in the entire waterway or a portion of it because of mining operations over the past century. There needs to be some law in place to correct these polluted streams and to prevent it from happening ever again AND the law needs to be enforced.
ReplyDeleteYou did a great job on your blog post and was on an important topic as well. I have had the opportunity to help Trout Unlimited do some stream restoration projects that were caused from mining. It seems to be a very in-depth issue that also tends to require a lot of funding for projects. I think there needs to be laws that are put in place to prevent these things from happening in the future. I do think we are making progress though, slowly.
ReplyDeleteExcellent blog post Ms. Sherwood! You bring up a good issue here. I personally am against mining for coal due to its affects both past and present on our environment, but I understand that it is a livelihood for people as well. Growing up in Clarion County I personally have seen the affects of pollution from old coal mines. I have seen streams that are completely orange or yellow with little to no life to be found in them. So if aquatic life can't survive than it can't be safe for our terrestrial wildlife to drink? I agree with you that mining does affect water quality negatively and that we need to look at other energy options so we can save our waterways and allow coal miners to find new jobs.
ReplyDelete