For my second blog post I
wanted to inform you about the recent pollution of the Shenandoah River. Many
recent reports have mentioned the startling level of Escherichia. Coli (E.
coli) being found in the Shenandoah River. The E. coli bacteria comes from the
fecal matter of livestock, whether they were in the water or the fecal matter
got washed into the river with storm runoff. In an article by Sarah Rankin
mentions that a new report finds that Virginia is failing to manage the waste
of millions of chickens and cows (Rankin 2017). The waste from these animals
contains the E. coli bacteria that is being washed into the Shenandoah River.
While the E. coli is the main worry of many people another problem that comes
from the livestock fecal matter that ends up in the river. This issue is the
increased amount of phosphorous in the water, which can lead to excessive plant
growth in algae. First I will go into the problems with E. coli in the water,
as it is not only an environmental hazard but a human health hazard as well.
|
Escherichia coli, which
is abbreviated as E. coli, are bacteria found in the intestines of people and
animals. While most varieties of E. coli are harmless and even helpful for
healthy digestion in the human intestinal tract. Despite this there are several
types of E. coli that are pathogenic, these E. coli varieties cause illnesses which
are either diarrhea or illnesses outside of the digestive tract. There are a
few ways that E. coli can be transmitted, mainly by contact with animals or
other people and contaminated food or water. There are six types of E. coli that
are associated with diarrhea, these and other pathogenic E. coli are categorized
as pathotypes. The fecal matter that has been either dropped into the
Shenandoah River or has been run into the river during heavy rain contains
pathogenic E. coli. This means that whenever people go into the Shenandoah
River they run the risk of ingesting trace amounts of the livestock fecal
matter that can be found within the river. Which in turn means that they may be
ingesting the pathogenic E. coli bacteria. While symptoms of E. coli ingestion
may vary the symptoms usually include diarrhea and vomiting, there may be a
fever but if there is it generally tends to be less than 101 degrees Fahrenheit.
Generally, a person effected by E. coli will get better within 5 to seven days,
and while some infections can be very mild others are very severe or even life
threatening. While anyone can be affected by E. coli young children, the
elderly and people who already have a weakened immune system have a higher
chance of developing a more severe illness (E. coli 2017).
The second problem caused
by is an algal bloom, though this does not seem like it would be harmful to
humans in some cases algal blooms can cause illness in humans and animals.
Algal blooms are caused by access nutrients in the water, the algae can grow and
divide exponentially, using up all the nutrients in the water. After using up
the nutrients in the water the algae start to die, the dead algae then begin to
decompose. The decomposition of the large volume of algae completely depletes
the oxygen supply within the body of water. This creates dead zones where there
is little or no oxygen in the water. As the name suggests nothing can live
within these dead zones, there will be no fish, aquatic invertebrates or plants
within the dead zones, they basically become underwater deserts. As I stated
before some algal blooms can cause illnesses in humans and other animals, this
is due to the production of toxins. Some algal blooms, called Harmful algal
blooms (HABs) produce toxins that when either ingested or inhaled can cause
serious illnesses (Harmful 2017).
Both environmental issues
are taking place within the Shenandoah River, due to lack of monitoring of farmland
within the Shenandoah Valley. According to an article by Megan Mathewson only
12.5 percent of the farmland within the Shenandoah Valley are required to have
pollution control plans (Mathewson 2017). This means that the remaining 87.5
percent of the Shenandoah Valley farmlands are left unmonitored. This results
in the overgrowth of algae, lower fish populations and the spread of E. coli
bacteria. In Jacob Fenston’s article he references a study where samples were
taken from a section of the Shenandoah River and tested for E. coli, a clear
majority of the samples exceeded levels considered safe for E. coli (Fenston
2017). In his article, Darryl Fears mentions data from 2014 to 2016 which
states that the poultry and cattle along the Shenandoah river produce more than
a billion combined pounds of waste a year that runs into the river (Fears 2017).
This waste increases both the amount of E. coli in the water and the number of
algae in the water.
I know you may be
wondering why you should care about pollution in the Shenandoah River, the main
reason is that it is a human cause issue. By letting livestock get near the
river farmers are increasing the likelihood of their livestock’s fecal matter
getting into the stream, even though the pollution is completely unintentional.
By making it mandatory for farmers to check the amount of nutrients in their
soil we may be able to decrease the amount of nutrient pollution enters the
water which will cut back on algal blooms and may even help with the E. coli in
the water if farmers keep their livestock farther from the water.
Citations:
E. coli (Escherichia
coli). 2017. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
<https://www.cdc.gov/ecoli/general/index.html> Accessed 27 Apr 2017.
Fears, D. 2017.
Shenandoah River: Livestock making mess of idyllic valley. The Washington Post. Gatehouse Media. <http://www.examiner-enterprise.com/news/20170427/shenandoah-river-livestock-making-mess-of-idyllic-valley> Accessed 27 Apr 2017.
Fenston, J. A. 2017.
Report Says Shenandoah River Fouled by Livestock. WAMU. American University. <http://wamu.org/story/17/04/26/report-says-shenandoah-river-fouled-livestock/> Accessed 27 Apr 2017
Harmful Algal Bloom
(HAB)-Associated Illness. 2017. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services. <https://www.cdc.gov/habs/>
Accessed 27 Apr 2017.
Mathewson, M. 2017.
Report: Unsafe Levels of Fecal Bacteria in Shenandoah River. NBC 29. NBC 29.
<http://www.nbc29.com/story/35256225/report-unsafe-levels-of-fecal-bacteria-in-shenandoah-river> Accessed 27 Apr
2017.
Rankin, S. 2017.
Correction: Shenandoah River-Pollution story. abc NEWS. abc NEWS. <http://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/report-cows-chickens-taint-shenandoah-river-coli-47042522> Accessed 27 April 2017
Images:
1.
http://vogeltalksrving.com/2015/09/shenandoah-river-state-park-the-mountains-are-calling
2.
http://www.popsci.com/scientists-design-genome-for-upgraded-e-coli/
3. https://www.cdc.gov/habs/
Why are some farms required to have pollution control plans, while others are not? Is it because of their location in reference to the river?
ReplyDeleteThis is a huge issue and I'm glad you brought it up. This could happen anywhere there is livestock and a water source, regardless of the size. E. Coli from livestock could even inhabit small, natural springs where people have direct contact or ingestion. Even though there are so many rules farmers have to follow, I feel a pollution or runoff control plan should be top priority, for everyone's sake.